Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Real Estate Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • Terrie Harman, Attorney
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates
You are here: Home / General / Are Customers of Extended Stay Hotels Tenants?

Are Customers of Extended Stay Hotels Tenants?

Apparently not.  The question is important because New Hampshire tenants have statutory protections against forced removal not available to hotel guests.  The New Hampshire Supreme Court addressed this question on March 8, 2019 in the matter of Natalie Anderson v. Adam Robitaille.

Ms. Anderson and her husband began residing at an extended stay “all-suite residential-style hotel” in Nashua in November 2015.  About fourteen months later, in January 2017, the general manager of the hotel informed Ms. Anderson her stay would end January 10, and if she did not leave, he would call the police.  What to do?

New Hampshire has two groups of statutes dealing with the removal of occupants of residential housing and hotels, RSA 540 and 540-A (tenants), and RSA 353 (hotel guests).  If an occupant is a “tenant,” then the owner/landlord must follow the procedures of RSA 540 to evict the occupant. This can take a minimum of two months.  If an occupant is not a “tenant,” then much faster procedures are available.

Ms. Anderson argued she was a tenant, and thus entitled to the slower, more cumbersome process under RSA 540.  She made four creative arguments, each of which the Court rejected.

Ms. Anderson’s Arguments

First, she argued she was not a “tenant,” as defined by the applicable statutes.  In addressing this argument, the court looked at both RSA 540 and RSA 540-A because the two statutes “deal with a similar subject matter.”  Taken together, and for purposes of this case, a tenant is defined as “one to whom a landlord rents or leases” residential premises.  Excepted from this definition are “rooms in hotels, motels, inns, tourist homes and other dwellings rented for recreational or vacation use.”

Ms. Anderson argued the term “hotel” did not include her extended stay hotel because the hotel does not “act and behave like a traditional hotel in every way.”  The court ruled no such exception existed in the statute.

Ms. Anderson next argued the clause “rented for recreational or vacation use” applied to hotels. This would mean a business user of a hotel is a tenant, while a recreational user of a hotel is not.  The court rejected this argument too.

Ms. Anderson then focused on the statute dealing with the removal of hotel guests, RSA 353.   Under her logic, if her occupancy did not fit within that statute, then she must be a tenant under the eviction statute, RSA 540.  Under RSA 353, the term rental unit “shall include residential property rented for one month or less.”  Because she rented her unit for longer than one month, her unit did not fall within RSA 353 and must, therefore, fall under RSA 540.  In nixing this argument, the court said the term “shall include” did not limit the definition to rental periods of one month or less, but could include longer periods as well.

Finally, Ms. Anderson turned to taxes.  RSA 78-A imposes a 9% tax on means and rooms, and excludes “any occupant who has occupied any room in a hotel for at least 185 consecutive days.”

You can contact Alfano Law Office here.

Filed Under: General, Legislation Tagged With: extended stay hotel, landlord, tenant

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Important Registry Updates
Important Court Updates

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.
Allobar Strategies

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Easements
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

Private Roads and Easements – What’s the Difference?

You probably think there should be a difference between … [Read More...]

Environmental Clean Up on a Property – Who is Responsible?

Environmental issues are everywhere. Hazards like heavy … [Read More...]

Reasons to Review Your Estate Plan

Have you taken the time to set up your estate plan? If you … [Read More...]

What to Know About Maintaining, Repairing, and Extending Easements on a Property

An easement is a piece of land that people, other than the … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2013
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • May 2011
  • July 2010
  • December 2005
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2022 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC