Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • David Howard, Attorney
    • Ariana Baldasaro McQuarrie
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
Home » Blog » Benner v. Grenier

Benner v. Grenier

New Hampshire Supreme Court Issues Mixed Ruling in Sibling Estate Squabble

In a December 1, 2022, Order, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire (the “Court”) rendered judgment on a matter concerning a sibling versus sibling fight over their mother’s estate. In the case of Gaetane Benner v. Claudetter Grenier (Case No. 2021-0506), Plaintiff Gaetane Benner (“Plaintiff”) appealed an order of the superior court dismissing her complaint against her sister, Defendant Claudette Grenier (“Defendant”) due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the New Hampshire probate laws.

Plaintiff’s complaint chiefly focused on two areas of alleged wrongdoing: (1) that Defendant, in her role as executor of their mother’s will, failed to provide Plaintiff with their mother’s wedding ring, in violation of the express provisions of their mother’s will and (2) Defendant, in her role as their mother’s power of attorney, misappropriated funds from several joint accounts held by Plaintiff and their mother. The superior court found that all of Plaintiff’s claims fell within the sole purview of the probate division, and as such, the superior court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to render judgment in Plaintiff’s case.

In its analysis, the Court began by discussing the respective jurisdictional parameters of the superior and probate courts. The Court explained that the superior court is a court of general jurisdiction. In the Matter of O’Neil & O’Neil, 159 N.H. 615, 622 (2010). Whereas the probate court division is limited to those specific areas of jurisdictions conferred by statute. Rogers v Rogers, 171 N.H. 738, 742 (2019). Specifically, New Hampshire law provides that the probate courts have jurisdiction over the granting of administration and all matters relating to the final distribution of estates and claims against the executor or administrator of those services and the interpretation and construction of wills. RSA 547:3, I (b)-(c). The Court found that in order to determine the proper forum of Plaintiff’s case, it would be necessary to evaluate the nature of each individual claim.

Regarding Plaintiff’s claims concerning her mother’s wedding ring, the Court held that such falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the probate court, as it specifically challenges the Defendant’s final distribution of their mother’s estate, and resolving this dispute depends upon the interpretation and construction of their mother’s will. In contrast, the Court found that Plaintiff’s claims concerning Defendant’s alleged misconduct in handling of funds in joint bank accounts of Plaintiff and her mother did not fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the probate court. The Court reasoned that resolving these issues does not require interpreting the will or codicil and the joint accounts were not part of the estate to be probated. Additionally, these claims are against the Defendant in her personal capacity, and not in her capacity of the executor of their mother’s estate.

Accordingly, the Court affirmed the superior court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for return of her mother’s wedding ring and reversed the superior court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims concerning alleged mishandling of funds she held in joint accounts with her mother.

You can contact Alfano Law Office at (603) 856-8411 or at this link.

Filed Under: Court Updates, General

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Locations

Bedford

Concord

Keene

Portsmouth

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Airbnb
  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Dealing with Neighbors
  • Easements
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Documents
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • Living Trust
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

Appeal of Town of Amherst

Housing Appeals Board Decision Affirmed by New Hampshire … [Read More...]

VT Telephone Co. v. FirstLight Fiber Inc.

Denied! Superior Court for the Northern District of … [Read More...]

What Is Road Acceptance?

(This is an excerpt from our Road Law Guide. To read more … [Read More...]

Why Developments Use Ponds to Prevent Stormwater Damage

If you have ever driven through newer developments, you may … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2023 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC