Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • Terrie Harman, Attorney
    • David Howard, Attorney
    • Melissa Farr, Attorney
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
Home » Blog » Costa and McCann v. PureFacts Financial Solutions

Costa and McCann v. PureFacts Financial Solutions

You’re Going to New York!

Superior Court for the Northern District of Hillsborough Enforces Forum Selection Clause

In a recent opinion handed down by the Superior Court for the Northern District of Hillsborough (the “Court”), Plaintiffs Grace Costa and Michael McCann (Plaintiffs) found themselves on the wrong side of a forum selection clause.

The case in controversy originated from a membership interest purchase agreement, wherein the Plaintiffs sold their interest in VennScience, LLC, to Defendant PureFacts Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant”). The membership purchase agreement contained a forum selection clause which stated that each party must submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state of New York should any disagreement arise. As part of the acquisition, Plaintiffs were offered employment positions within the company. However, disagreements soon arose which ultimately led to the Plaintiffs challenging the membership interest purchase agreement in New Hampshire state court.

In this action, Plaintiffs moved for the forum selection clause contained in the membership purchase agreement to be found unenforceable. In reviewing the Plaintiffs’ motion, the Court first looked to RSA 508-A:3, which provides that if parties agree in writing that an action or controversy shall be brought only in another state, but it is brought in New Hampshire, then the action will be dismissed unless one or more of the five exceptions provided in RSA-A:3 exist. The Plaintiffs argued that two of the provided exceptions existed in their scenario – (1) that New York would be a substantially less convenient place for the trial to be held than New Hampshire and (2) that it would be unfair and/or unreasonable to enforce the agreement.

The Plaintiffs stated that it was substantially inconvenient and unreasonable to hold the trial in New York because none of the parties were located in New York, no acts related to the action occurred in New York, and no witnesses were in New York, among other claims. The Court concluded that RSA 508-A:3 includes no such requirement that there be a significant relationship between the parties and/or the agreement and the selected forum. As such, it is an inappropriate factor to consider when analyzing the enforceability of the clause.

Regarding the Plaintiffs’ contention that holding the trial in New York would be a substantial inconvenience to both parties, the Court cited to the United States Supreme Court opinion in Atlantic Marine Const. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Texas, wherein the Supreme Court held that “[w]hen parties agree to a forum-selection clause, they waive the right to challenge the preselected forum as inconvenient or less convenient for themselves or their witnesses, or for their pursuit of litigation…” as the inconvenience suffered by the parties “…was clearly foreseeable at the time of contracting.” 571 U.S. 49, 64 (2013).

The Court denied Plaintiffs’ request to find the forum selection clause unenforceable and declined to address the choice of law provision contained in the agreement, declaring that the New York court that will preside over the dispute should address such provision.

You can contact Alfano Law Office at (603) 856-8411 or at this link.

Filed Under: Court Updates, General

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Important Registry Updates
Important Court Updates

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.
Allobar Strategies

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Airbnb
  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Dealing with Neighbors
  • Easements
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Documents
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • Living Trust
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

TransFarmations, Inc. v. Town of Amherst

New Hampshire Supreme Court Reverses Planning Board Decision … [Read More...]

Keene Auto Body v. State Farm

ATTENTION INSURANCE COMPANIES! It’s time to look closely at … [Read More...]

The Story of the Hermit and His “Generous” Deed Gift

Have you heard of a famous hermit named Perley E. Swett? He … [Read More...]

Create Your Will and Estate Plan Before It Is Too Late

No one wants to think about something terrible happening to … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2013
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • May 2011
  • July 2010
  • December 2005
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2023 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC