Alfano Law Office, PLLC

  • ALFANO LAW WEBSITE
Home » Takings Claims in New Hampshire: How Penn Central is Applied

Takings Claims in New Hampshire: How Penn Central is Applied

Any local, or state, government can use their eminent domain authority to use a private property for any public project. These projects normally include widening a highway and constructing a bike path or sidewalk, but there are many other reasons why a property is needed. Most of the time, the private property must be sold to the government. But there are times when only a piece of the land is required. 

The government is supposed to compensate the landowner for the private property. The landowner can easily challenge the amount of compensation they are being offered, but most likely won’t get a higher amount. They can also file an inverse condemnation, or takings claim, if the government takes any part of their property without paying for it. There are multiple variations of takings claims in the state of New Hampshire. 

How Penn Central is Applied to Takings Claims

Every court in New Hampshire applies Penn Central factors to all partial takings. A partial taking is when the value of the property is diminished by less than the full amount of the original property value. Instead of using a strict formula, Penn Central looks at specific circumstances of each individual case to see if compensation is necessary. 

The most common Penn Central factors considered include:

  • The character of the government action
  • The regulation’s economic impact for the landowner
  • The extent of which the regulation interferes with the investment backed expectations

The Character of the Government Action

A taking is commonly characterized when it is a physical invasion of any piece of property. Sometimes, the government may want more of one piece of property than all of the others. And yet, they may only be offering the same compensation, despite the larger piece of land. The ruling would be different if it offered better benefits for the general public, as well as the affected landowners. 

The Economic Impact for the Landowner

The fair market value of a property can change drastically when a taking occurs. Courts can easily compare the value of the property prior to the taking to what the value of the property is after the taking. The difference must be substantial if a takings claim is going to be approved. 

While a 50% difference may seem substantial to a landowner, takings claims for 75% diminished property values have been denied in the past. Therefore, the property value must really be lowered by much more if a landowner wants to win their takings claim. Of course, each scenario is different and the Penn Central factors may result in a lower diminished property value being considered as a major economic impact for a landowner. 

Investment Backed Expectations

Some property owners have investment backed expectations for the land they purchased. Those landowners may have purchased a piece of property to develop it, but then the government may have changed the zoning laws after the fact. In those cases, the landowner has an excellent case for a takings claim. 

However, if the landowner purchased the property knowing they would need to change local land usage laws, they would not have much of a takings claim case. 

Takings claims can be difficult to win, because a specific landowner, or a group of specific landowners, must bear the burden of the new regulation. Thankfully, they are made slightly easier with the Penn Central factors that are used. 

If you are in a situation where you are considering filing a takings claim, contact our office today.

Filed Under: Property Rights, Real Estate Law

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Airbnb
  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Dealing with Neighbors
  • Easements
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Documents
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • Living Trust
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

Should You Form an Association for Your Private Road in New Hampshire?

Private Roads in NH Series - Part III Should you form an … [Read More...]

NH Supreme Court Mostly Affirms Enforcement of Ordinance Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals of Properties Unless Owner Occupied and Operated

New Hampshire Supreme Court Mostly Affirms Enforcement of … [Read More...]

NH Supreme Court Finds Plaintiffs Timely Perfected Appeal Despite Zoning Board Delay in Issuing Written Decision

New Hampshire Supreme Court Finds Plaintiffs Timely … [Read More...]

NH Supreme Court Affirms Decision to Uphold Declaratory Judgment on Ownership of Foreclosed Property

A three-justice panel of the New Hampshire Supreme Court … [Read More...]

Article Archives

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2023 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC