Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Real Estate Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • Terrie Harman, Attorney
    • Jim Soucy, Attorney
    • Michael D. Cameron, Attorney
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates
You are here: Home / General / Filing a Takings Claim in New Hampshire? How Penn Central is Applied

Filing a Takings Claim in New Hampshire? How Penn Central is Applied

Any local, or state, government can use their eminent domain authority to use a private property for any public project. These projects normally include widening a highway and constructing a bike path or sidewalk, but there are many other reasons why a property is needed. Most of the time, the private property must be sold to the government. But there are times when only a piece of the land is required. 

The government is supposed to compensate the landowner for the private property. The landowner can easily challenge the amount of compensation they are being offered, but most likely won’t get a higher amount. They can also file an inverse condemnation, or takings claim, if the government takes any part of their property without paying for it. There are multiple variations of takings claims in the state of New Hampshire. 

How Penn Central is Applied to Takings Claims

Every court in New Hampshire applies Penn Central factors to all partial takings. A partial taking is when the value of the property is diminished by less than the full amount of the original property value. Instead of using a strict formula, Penn Central looks at specific circumstances of each individual case to see if compensation is necessary. 

The most common Penn Central factors considered include:

  • The character of the government action
  • The regulation’s economic impact for the landowner
  • The extent of which the regulation interferes with the investment backed expectations

The Character of the Government Action

A taking is commonly characterized when it is a physical invasion of any piece of property. Sometimes, the government may want more of one piece of property than all of the others. And yet, they may only be offering the same compensation, despite the larger piece of land. The ruling would be different if it offered better benefits for the general public, as well as the affected landowners. 

The Economic Impact for the Landowner

The fair market value of a property can change drastically when a taking occurs. Courts can easily compare the value of the property prior to the taking to what the value of the property is after the taking. The difference must be substantial if a takings claim is going to be approved. 

While a 50% difference may seem substantial to a landowner, takings claims for 75% diminished property values have been denied in the past. Therefore, the property value must really be lowered by much more if a landowner wants to win their takings claim. Of course, each scenario is different and the Penn Central factors may result in a lower diminished property value being considered as a major economic impact for a landowner. 

Investment Backed Expectations

Some property owners have investment backed expectations for the land they purchased. Those landowners may have purchased a piece of property to develop it, but then the government may have changed the zoning laws after the fact. In those cases, the landowner has an excellent case for a takings claim. 

However, if the landowner purchased the property knowing they would need to change local land usage laws, they would not have much of a takings claim case. 

Takings claims can be difficult to win, because a specific landowner, or a group of specific landowners, must bear the burden of the new regulation. Thankfully, they are made slightly easier with the Penn Central factors that are used. 

If you are in a situation where you are considering filing a takings claim, contact our office today.

Filed Under: General

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Important Registry Updates
Important Court Updates

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.
Allobar Strategies

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Covid-19
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

Benefits of Creating a Revocable Trust

Creating a revocable trust is something everyone should do, … [Read More...]

Understanding What Property Really Is

When a person begins to describe the property, they might be … [Read More...]

Top Legal Terms Explained

Throughout your life, you have probably heard a few common … [Read More...]

New Hampshire Supreme Court Interprets Road Maintenance Release

In a memorandum opinion dated March 16, 2022, the New … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2013
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • May 2011
  • July 2010
  • December 2005
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2022 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC