Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Real Estate Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • Terrie Harman, Attorney
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates
You are here: Home / Property Tax Law / Property Tax Round-Up – 2011

Property Tax Round-Up – 2011

loan-modificationPublished on the New Hampshire Bar Association web site on February 17, 2012.

Both the General Court and Supreme Court were active in 2011. Here is a summary of key developments.

Court Decisions

In Appeal of City of Lebanon, 161 N.H. 463 (2011), the Supreme Court addressed who qualifies as an “aggrieved party” where real estate is subject to a triple net lease. “We now clarify that when a taxpayer owns more than one parcel in any given municipality, a request for abatement on one will always require consideration of the assessment on any other parcels for which the owner is also the taxpayer.” The key, however, is whether the owner/taxpayer also is the taxpayer for those other parcels.

The taxpayer owed two lots, one of which was subject to a seventy-five year, triple-net sublease giving the subtenant the right to pursue tax abatements. (The subtenant also had the right to terminate the lease after twenty-five years.) The court held that the owner/taxpayer was required to introduce evidence of disproportionality only for the lot it challenged, which was not the lot subject to the long-term, triple-net lease. The court’s ruling was quite broad and may open the door for much shorter leases. The court did not seem to consider the length of the lease important. In fact, it appears irrelevant. What seems to matter is who has the obligation to pay taxes as between the landlord and tenant.

In Appeal of Ned Wilson, 161 N.H. 659 (2011), the Supreme Court held the failure of the taxpayer to sign the municipal abatement application was fatal because it violated an express requirement of RSA 76:16, III. The taxpayer challenged BTLA Rule 203.02(d), which also requires the taxpayer’s signature on the application. The Court found Rule 203.02 to be a “reasonable rule for carrying out the BTLA’s’ functions.” It should be noted Rule 203.02(d) permits the BTLA to hear an appeal where the absence of the taxpayer’s signature on the municipal application was “due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect,” so the door may remain open for taxpayer’s to assert this exception in appeals to the BTLA. (The BTLA in Wilson had found no reasonable cause for the petitioner’s failure to sign the application.)

Appeal of City of Concord, 161 N.H. 344 (2011), clarified the “charitable purpose” legs of the four-part test for organizations seeking a charitable tax exemption under RSA 72:23, V and RSA 72:23-l. The purpose, both as “established and administered,” must primarily benefit the public versus the organization’s members.

In Appeal of David H. Johnson, 161 N.H. 419 (2011), the court held that two properties owned by the same person and connected by a private right of way do not “adjoin” for purposes of RSA 75:9, which requires such lots be assessed separately. The court also clarified that assessors may not “assemble” lots under current ownership for valuation purposes if the lots do not adjoin, which they did not in this case.

Legislative Changes

Chapter 206, Laws of 2011, eliminated the requirement that taxpayers in municipalities with inventories file the inventory to preserve the right to appeal the assessment. Chapter 224 reduced the number of BTLA members from four to three, eliminated the requirement that one member be an attorney, and reduced the terms from five years to three. Both laws went into effect last July.

 

Filed Under: Property Tax Law Tagged With: legislative changes, New Hampshire Bar Association, property tax

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Important Registry Updates
Important Court Updates

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.
Allobar Strategies

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Easements
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

Private Roads and Easements – What’s the Difference?

You probably think there should be a difference between … [Read More...]

Environmental Clean Up on a Property – Who is Responsible?

Environmental issues are everywhere. Hazards like heavy … [Read More...]

Reasons to Review Your Estate Plan

Have you taken the time to set up your estate plan? If you … [Read More...]

What to Know About Maintaining, Repairing, and Extending Easements on a Property

An easement is a piece of land that people, other than the … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2013
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • May 2011
  • July 2010
  • December 2005
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2022 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC