Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Real Estate Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • Terrie Harman, Attorney
    • Jim Soucy, Attorney
    • Marissa Schuetz, Attorney
    • Michael D. Cameron, Attorney
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates
You are here: Home / Real Estate Law / So Where is All the Land-Locked Land?

So Where is All the Land-Locked Land?

woods-path-646x433There is a conspiracy of carelessness in New Hampshire, and it is costing people money.  Property owners throw around the term “land-locked” thinking their land has no access.  What most of them do not realize is that while their land may have no written access, either by deed, easement or court decree, it probably has actual access.  In fact, land with no access is largely a myth.  More often than not, research can establish a strong case for an implied easement which, when decreed by a court, creates access to the once “land-locked” parcel.

In a long line of cases, New Hampshire courts presume a person subdividing land does not intend to create a back parcel with no access and, thus, little value.  This presumption gives rise to easements by necessity, a type of implied easement.  “It is reasonable to suppose that the grantee bought the land for some useful purpose, and if he cannot enjoy the beneficial use of it except by means of a way over the adjoining land of the grantor, it is but reasonable and just to find that he acquired such a way.  The same reasoning applies when a grantor retains land which he cannot use without crossing the land conveyed.  A way of necessity is reserved to him in the grantee’s land.”[1]

Easements by necessity arise from the implied intent of the parties, but necessity alone is insufficient to create an easement.  Rather, the surrounding circumstances must be examined to determine whether they will support the conclusion that the parties intended to create an easement.  The circumstances surrounding the transaction are controlling and they must be such as to raise a reasonable implication of right granted.

I suggest a three-step analysis.  The first step is to search the title back to the original subdivision creating the back lot.  There must be unity of ownership of both the “dominant” estate (the land benefited by the easement) and the “servient” estate (the land burdened by the easement).  Someone can create an easement only over land he or she owns.  If a parcel loses access at some later date through eminent domain or other method, the owner may not assert an implied access easement over someone else’s land.

The second step is to see if the landowner created a back parcel with no express access.  If so, then the back parcel is an excellent candidate to be benefited by an easement by necessity over the front parcel.

The third step is to look for evidence showing the landowner considered access in some manner without expressly creating access.  Reference to access, even poor or ineffective access, demonstrates the landowner considered the topic and intended to do whatever he or she did, and an implied easement probably does not exist.  It is difficult to conclude a landowner intended to do one thing while expressly doing something else.

When is a parcel truly land-locked?  If a subdivider merely addresses access in the deed or other instrument, even if the access is poor or ineffective, a court likely will not conclude the parties intended to create an easement elsewhere.  For example, where a conveyance includes a right of way to a limited access highway without the grantee having the right to access the highway, no easement by necessity exists.  The reason is the express grant of access to the limited access highway, however useless, precluded the implication of an easement by necessity in some other location.[2]   It certainly would have been more convenient had there been access other than to a limited access highway, but that was not the parties’ agreement.  Mere convenience is not enough to establish an easement by necessity.  In this scenario, a land-locked parcel exists with little hope of establishing an easement through judicial process.

If your three-step analysis establishes the landowner did not address access, you have a strong argument for an easement by necessity.  Once you establish your access potential, the width of the implied access easement is less clear.  If not specified, the test of an appropriate width is what is reasonable for suitable and convenient use of the way for its ordinary and intended purpose.  Most zoning ordinances require fifty-foot roads.  One certainly can make the argument an implied easement should be fifty feet wide.  If the easement does not satisfy zoning, then the landowner cannot pull a building permit, and if the landowner cannot build anything, then what value does the land have?

Another wrinkle is the extent of the access.  Can the back lot be subdivided?  How about heavy commercial versus residential use?  A New Hampshire court probably would apply reasonableness by balancing the benefit to the owner of the dominant estate against the burden to the owner of the servient estate.  The other analysis a court will make is whether the proposed change or increase in use is so substantial as to constitute a new easement altogether.

Keep in mind only a court order or written conveyance can establish access rights conclusively.  No matter how strong, the facts only form the basis for a claim of access.  Absent an agreement with the other landowner, a property owner will need to file a petition to quiet title.

So when someone describes real estate as “land-locked,” do not assume the land has no access.  Instead, assume the land does have access, but the access simply has not been expressed in a deed, easement or court decree.  Actual access likely is there, patiently waiting for someone to take notice and unlock it.


[1] Whittier v. Winkley, 62 N.H. 338 at 339-340 (1882).

[2] Plastic Laminated Products., Inc. v. Seppela, 115 N.H. 22 (1975).

Filed Under: Real Estate Law Tagged With: Conveyance, Land, Locked

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Important Registry Updates
Important Court Updates

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.
Allobar Strategies

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Allobar Strategies
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
  • Covid-19 Updates

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Court Updates
  • Covid-19
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Legislation
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Property Investments
  • Property Tax Law
  • Real Estate Law
  • Road Law
  • Taxes

Recent News Letters

March 2020

December 2019

November 2019

October 2019

August 2019

July 2019

May 2019

Recent Articles

NH Supreme Court Holds that Tenants’ Right of First Offer to Purchase Rented Property can be Triggered by the Owners’ Intent to Sell.

It is common for residential leases to include options … [Read More...]

March 1 is the Deadline to Request a Refund of New Hampshire Property Taxes

March 1, 2021 is the deadline to challenge your 2020 real … [Read More...]

NHPVRTA SUBMITS DRAFT OF NEW BILL ON PRIVATE ROADS TO THE NH SENATE

New Hampshire Private Road Taxpayers Alliance (NHPVRTA) is a … [Read More...]

Understanding Commercial Site Planning in New Hampshire

Obtaining a rezoning of property to a commercial zoning … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2013
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • May 2011
  • July 2010
  • December 2005
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2021 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC

Sign up to receive our FREE Road Law Guide

Everything you need to know about navigating public and private road laws in New Hampshire.

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.