Alfano Law Office, PLLC

Alfano Law Office, PLLC
Phone: (603) 856-8411 • Fax (603) 290-5521
4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301
  • Home
  • Real Estate Law
    • Road Law
    • Commercial Real Estate Law
    • Tax Abatements
    • Business Law
  • Estate Planning
  • About Us
    • Paul J. Alfano, Attorney
    • John F. Hayes, Attorney
    • David Howard, Attorney
    • Ariana Baldasaro McQuarrie
    • Privacy Policy
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
    • Directions
  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA
Home » Blog » VT Telephone Co. v. FirstLight Fiber Inc.

VT Telephone Co. v. FirstLight Fiber Inc.

Denied! Superior Court for the Northern District of Hillsborough denies dueling motions for summary judgment

In a recent decision out of the Superior Court for the Northern District of Hillsborough (the “Court”), dueling motions for summary judgments submitted by Vermont Telephone Company, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and FirstLight Fiber, Inc. (“Defendant”) were denied.

The conflict between Plaintiff and Defendant goes all the way back to 2014, when the parties entered into a Dark Fiber Lease Agreement (the “Contract”). The Contract provided that Plaintiff would have access to certain dark fiber running along a fixed route between Lebanon, New Hampshire and Boston, Massachusetts. The center of the parties’ dispute lies in the Contract’s confidentiality clause, which provides in relevant part, that no confidential information of either party be “divulged” to any third parties.

In June 2019, an employee of Plaintiff’s escorted a reporter into facilities where Defendant’s equipment was being stored. During these visits, the reporter took photographs of Defendant’s equipment, and then subsequently published an article which included the photographs. Defendant soon thereafter sent notice to Plaintiff that it was terminating the Contract due to Plaintiff’s breach of the confidentiality clause, which led to the filing of this suit, with both parties alleging claims of breach of contract against the other and filing competing motions for summary judgment.

In its analysis of the case, the Court first summarized its standard of review on cross motions for summary judgment, stating that it will view “the evidence presented in the light most favorable to each party in its capacity as the nonmoving party and, if no genuine issue of material fact exists, the Court will determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Citing JMJ Properties, LLC v. Town of Auburn, 168 N.H. 127, 129-30 (2015).

The confidentiality clause states that neither party shall “divulge” the other’s confidential information to any third parties. Plaintiff argued that it did not breach the confidentiality clause because it never “divulged” Defendant’s confidential information. Plaintiff explained that the applicable definitions of the word “divulge” require some affirmative action, of which Plaintiff never partook. Plaintiff contended that it was the reporter’s act of taking and publishing the photographs of Defendant’s equipment that caused Defendant’s harm, rather than an act of the Plaintiff or its employees. Defendant countered, arguing that it was the Plaintiff’s act of giving the reporter access to the equipment that was the affirmative step in divulging its confidential information. Defendant explained that the facilities where its equipment was housed were heavily secured and that Plaintiff had to take the reporter through several locked gates and doors in order to access the equipment. Plaintiff acknowledged that it took the reporter into the facilities for the purpose of taking photographs, but that it was only for the purpose of taking photos of Plaintiff’s equipment, and Plaintiff was unaware that the reporter took photos of Defendant’s equipment.

The Court found that for Plaintiff to have “divulged” Defendant’s confidential information, there must have been some intent or knowledge of the reporter taking the photographs. The Court reasoned that there was a material question of fact regarding whether Plaintiff purposely invited the reporter to the facility with the intent of allowing him to take and publish photographs of Defendant’s equipment, and therefore, a grant of summary judgment on the issue was inappropriate.

You can contact Alfano Law Office by calling (603) 856-8411 or at this link.

Filed Under: Court Updates

The above information is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Locations

Bedford

Concord

Keene

Portsmouth

Subscribe to the Alfano Law Property Rights Alert

Sign Up Now

For Email Newsletters you can trust.

NH Tax Abatement

  • Road Law Guide
  • NH Tax Abatement
    • Tax Abatement Team
    • Grounds for Abatement
    • Municipal Application
    • Owners of Properties Outside New Hampshire
    • Transfer Tax Allocation
    • Recent Laws and Rulings
  • Resources and Links
    • Calendar and Key Dates
    • Equalization Ratio
    • NAPTA

NH Real Estate Law Articles

  • Airbnb
  • Common Neighborly Legal Issues
  • Court Updates
  • Dealing with Neighbors
  • Easements
  • Estate Planning
  • General
  • Historic Designation
  • Legal Documents
  • Legal Terms
  • Legislation
    • Business Law
  • Living Trust
  • New Hampshire Property Tax Alerts
  • Private Road Maintenance
  • Private Roads
  • Property
  • Property Investments
  • Property Rights
  • Property Tax
  • Property Tax Law
  • Quieting Title
  • Real Estate Law
  • Revocable Trust
  • Road Law
  • Tax Abatement
  • Taxes
  • Zoning Boards of Adjustments

Recent Articles

Appeal of Town of Amherst

Housing Appeals Board Decision Affirmed by New Hampshire … [Read More...]

VT Telephone Co. v. FirstLight Fiber Inc.

Denied! Superior Court for the Northern District of … [Read More...]

What Is Road Acceptance?

(This is an excerpt from our Road Law Guide. To read more … [Read More...]

Why Developments Use Ponds to Prevent Stormwater Damage

If you have ever driven through newer developments, you may … [Read More...]

Article Archives

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Alfano Law Office, PLLC, 4 Park Street, Concord, NH 03301 USA | Phone: (603) 856-8411
Copyright © 2023 · Alfano Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved · Website design by InterActive Synergy, LLC